In his response, Judge Dan Slayton considers ARS 28-812 to place upon
bicyclists the "same rights and duties as a driver of a _motor_
vehicle...".  He purports to quote from statute but adds the
significant word "motor", and does it without referencing the
explanation of my own understanding given in the appeal.

He probably glossed over all details, and his short reply fails to
address most of my arguments (Selz, DOT signs, Maxwell and the AG
opinion, the applicability of 704A).  Although I learned some good
things while preparing the appeal, Slayton's response contributes
nothing of note.